基于深度学习的山丘区中小河流洪水预报误差校正方法
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.河北省水文勘测研究中心;2.华北水利水电大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

P338

基金项目:


Error correction method for flood forecasting of medium and small catchments in hilly areas based on deep learning
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Hydrological Survey and Research Center of Hebei Province;2.North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    中小河流产汇流情况复杂,洪水预报难度很大。为了提高中小河流洪水预报的精度,以河北省邢台市坡底流域为研究对象,分别基于蓄满产流和混合产流模式构建分布式模型进行降雨径流模拟。分别采用LSTM、Transformer、Transformer+LSTM叠加模型(TFLS)构建校正模型,采用差分进化算法对超参数进行优化。以实测降雨和分布式模型模拟结果为输入,对各时段的残差进行拟合,进而对径流模拟结果进行校正。研究结果表明,在17场洪水模拟结果中,混合产流模型表现优于蓄满产流,TFLS模型的校正效果优于LSTM和Transformer。与混合产流模型相比,TFLS模型洪峰误差不超过20%的场次从9场增加至12场,占全部场次的70.6%,确定性系数不低于0.8的场次从5场增加到9场,占比为52.9%。TFLS模型在流量不超过500m3/s时的校正效果优于LSTM和Transformer模型,LSTM对流量在500m3/s及以上的校正效果略优于其它模型。

    Abstract:

    Due to the complex runoff and concentration situation, flood forecasting for small and medium-sized catchments is very difficult. In order to improve the accuracy of flood forecasting, this study constructs a distributed model for flood forecasting based on full storage runoff and mixed runoff model respectively, taking the PoDi Basin in Xingtai City, Hebei Province as study case. LSTM, Transformer, Transformer and LSTM combining models (TFLS) were used to construct the correction model, and the differential evolution (DE) algorithm was used to optimize the hyperparameters. Taking the observed rainfall and distributed model simulation results as input, the residuals of observation flow are fitted, and then the simulation results are corrected. The results show that in the 17 flood simulation results, the mixed runoff model performs better than the full-storage runoff model, and the correction effect of TFLS model is better than LSTM and Transformer models. Compared with the mixed runoff model, the number of floods with peek error not exceeding 20% increased from 9 to 12, accounting for 70.6% of all floods. The number of floods with Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient not less than 0.8 has increased from 5 to 9, accounting for 52.9% of all floods. The performance of the TFLS model is better than other models when the observed flow does not exceed 500m3/s, and the performance of LSTM is slightly better than other models when the flow exceed 500m3/s.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-23
  • 最后修改日期:2024-08-13
  • 录用日期:2024-08-19
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: