不同耕地类型对流域水沙过程的影响研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

魏冲(1994-),男,湖北武汉人,博士研究生,主要从事水文学与水资源方面研究。E-mail:2278696332@qq.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

P334+.92

基金项目:

水利部公益性行业科研专项(201301066);国家自然科学基金项目(40701024);


Influence of Different Arable Land Types on Water and Sediment Processes in River Basin
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    常用的水土保持措施是退耕还林,但淮河流域是中国重要的农业产区,大规模实行退耕还林并不现实,所以通过调整耕地类型来减少水土流失可能是解决社会经济发展和生态保护矛盾的好方法。为研究不同耕地类型对流域水文要素及产沙的影响,考虑水田和旱地两种耕地类型对淮河息县水文站上游流域构建SWAT模型,构造A(实际耕地利用方式)、B(所有耕地为水田)和C(所有耕地为旱地)三种耕地类型情景,比较不同耕地类型情景下流域水文要素及产沙的变化情况。研究结果表明:所构建的SWAT模型在息县流域径流及泥沙模拟中具有良好的适用性,R2和NSE(Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency)均达到0.75以上;水田和旱地两种不同耕地类型对流域多年年均蒸散发及多年平均径流量影响较小,但对流域产沙量影响较大,在汛期更为明显,模拟期内每平方公里水田每年最多比旱地少产沙491.8t,平均每年少产沙约208.7t。采取水田耕种比旱地耕种更有利于减少息县流域内的水土流失。

    Abstract:

    The Huaihe River basin is suffering from serious soil erosion in recent decades. Thus, it is urgent to control the soilerosion. Commonly used measures to maintain water and soil are returning farmland to forests, as it is an important agriculturalproduction area in China, large -scale return of arable land to forests is unrealistic. Adjusting the type of arable land formaintaining water and soil is an alternative way to balance the contradictions between economic development and ecologicalprotection. In order to analyze the effects of different types of arable land on hydrology and sediment yield in a basin, the SWATmodel was constructed for the upper catchment of the Xixian hydrological station in the Huaihe River which takes both the paddyfield and the dry land into account. Three scenarios were considered as follows: (A) Actual arable land use method, (B) all arableland is paddy field, and (C) all arable land are dry lands. The results show that the SWAT model has good accuracy insimulations of runoff and sediment in the Xixian basin, both of the R2 and NSE (Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency) values are greater than0.75. The two different types of arable land in paddy fields and dry land have little impacts on the annual averageevapotranspiration and annual average runoff of the basin, but have a greater impact on the sediment yield, especially in floodseasons. Compared to dry land, the paddy field could decrease the sediment yield in the range from 33.5t to 491.8t, with anaverage of 208.7t during the simulation period. This study suggests that taking paddy field cultivation is more conducive toreducing soil erosion in the Xixian River basin than dryland cultivation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-19
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-06-24
  • 出版日期: