拓扑克里格法与普通克里格法在区域洪水频率分析中的比较研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

顾西辉 (1990-),男,河南信阳人,硕士,主要从事气象水文学研究工作。 E-mail:guxihui421@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

P333.2

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(41071020);新世纪优秀人才支持计划共同资助成果;


Compare Top-kriging and Ordinary Kriging in Area Flood Frequency Analysis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    依据北江(珠江流域支流)流域6个水文测站年最大洪峰流量资料,分别用Top-kriging(拓扑克里格法)和普通克里格法进行区域洪水频率估计。采用均方根误差作为频率分布线型拟合优度指标。运用线性矩法进行单站洪水频率分析,确定10、50、100、1000年一遇设计洪水值。在此基础上,从Topkriging和普通克里格法设计洪水估计不确定性和相对线性矩法单站洪水频率的估计误差两个方面比较Top-kriging和普通克里格法。结果表明:(1)Top-kriging法是更好的线性无偏估计,相比普通克里格法更适合于区域洪水频率估计;(2)Top-kriging法设计洪水估计不确定性明显小于普通克里格法;(3)Top-kriging法设计洪水估计结果更接近线性矩法单站洪水频率分析结果。

    Abstract:

    Based on the annual maximum peak flow data from the 6 hydrometry stations in the Beijiang River Basin, Top-kriging and ordinary kriging for regional flood frequency methods were respectively used to estimate area flood frequency. Root mean square error was used as a goodness of fit index of frequency distribution. Linear moment as a single station flood frequency analysis method was used to determine the design flood values of 10-year, 50-year, 100 year, 1000-year. Based on the above-mentioned, Top-kriging and ordinary kriging were compared in two aspects: design flood estimation uncertainty and single station flood frequency estimation error which based on linear moment method. The results show that: (1) Top-kriging is a better linear unbiased estimation, comparing to ordinary kriging method it is more suitable for area flood frequency estimation; (2) Top-kriging method of design flood estimation uncertainty is significantly less than the ordinary kriging; (3) Top-kriging method of design flood estimation is closer to the linear moment method single station flood frequency analysis.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2013-08-15
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-06-21
  • 出版日期: